Endocrinology Research and Practice
Original Articles

Association Between Prognostic Nutritional Index and Bone Mineral Density, Fracture Risk Assessment (FRAX) Tool, and Disability in Patients with Postmenopausal Osteopenia/Osteoporosis: A CrossSectional Study

1.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kırıkkale University Faculty of Medicine, Kırıkkale, Türkiye

2.

Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Health Sciences, Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye

3.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye

Endocrinol Res Pract 2024; 28: 143-150
DOI: 10.5152/erp.2024.24438
Read: 593 Downloads: 286 Published: 30 May 2024

Objective: To evaluate the relationship between prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and bone mineral density (BMD) values and disability in patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis.

Methods: Between January 2022 and January 2023, 106 postmenopausal women with osteopenia (n=54) and osteoporosis (n=52) were included in the study. Patients with a disease or medication causing secondary osteoporosis were excluded. Bone mineral density was evaluated using dualenergy X-ray absorptiometry. Nutritional status was measured using the PNI, which was calculated using total lymphocyte count and serum albumin levels. The Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) was used to evaluate disability.

Results: The mean age of the participants was 63.78 ± 7.53 years. Prognostic nutritional index was positively correlated with total hip BMD values (r = 0.217, P=.029) and total hip T-scores (r = 0.207, P=.037) and negatively correlated with Fracture Assessment Tool Model (FRAX)-major fracture risk (r = −0.399, P < .001), FRAX-hip fracture risk (r = −0.300, P=.002), and HAQ-DI scores (r = -−0.474, P <  .001). The mean PNI was lower in patients with a history of falls than in those without falls (P < .001). The mean PNI was lower in patients with a history of osteoporotic fractures than in those without a fracture history (P=.007). Multivariate linear regression analyses showed that PNI was the only independent variable for HAQ-DI (B = −0.040, P < .001) (R2=0.17).

Conclusion: Using PNI in clinical practice may be beneficial because of its association with BMD values and for predicting the independence of patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis. If a disability is detected, a multidisciplinary approach should be considered, including rehabilitation and improvement of nutritional condition.

Cite this article as: Baday-Keskin D, Hepşen S, Uz C. Association between prognostic nutritional index and bone mineral density, fracture risk assessment (FRAX) tool, and disability in patients with postmenopausal osteopenia/osteoporosis: A cross-sectional study. Endocrinol Res Pract. 2024;28(3):143-150.

Files
EISSN 2822-6135